Unveiling Hidden Narratives: The Backbones of Mount Vernon’s Legacy
In her review of Scott E. Casper’s book “Sarah Johnson’s Mount Vernon: The Forgotten History of an Ameican Shrine,” Martha S. Jones explores the complex history of Mount Vernon, highlighting the contribution of African Americans, both enslaved and free, who lived and worked there. Casper examines how the site transitioned from a working plantation to a historic site, and how African Americans played crucial roles in that transformation. Casper emphasizes the importance of including the African American perspective in the preservation and interpretation of Mount Vernon’s history, showing how their contribitions have often been overlooked or misrepresented.
PART ONE: Casper and others refer to Mount Vernon as a “shrine.” How does such language shape historic preservation and interpretation at the enslaved labor plantation of George Washington?
When people call Mount Vernon a “shrine”, it brings a sense of importance to the masses. This description of Mount Vernon can affect how we as people preserve and interpret the site which gives workers and visitors determination to respect it and keep it in good shape. Focusing on George Washington, in this context the word “shrine” gives a sense of elevation of George Washington’s status and legacy which overshadows the other important aspects of the site’s history, such as the lives and experiences of his slaves. This kind of language can lead to visitors only remembering the good parts of history and ignoring the tough parts like slavery which can trigger/anger marginalized groups who had. When people visit historical sights, they tend to have a sense of respect and reverence, making them more likely to accept the main story that was told by the tourists on the site.
PART TWO: Despite the prevalence of factual errors, misremembering, and embellishment in oral history, what value does it offer for historic preservation?
Oral history, despite its potential inaccuracies, offer value for historic preservation. Oral histories provide personal accounts and experiences that aren’t often captured in written records. These narratives can offer insight into the daily lives, emotions, and social dynamics that official documents might/try to overlook. Revealing cultural practices, traditions, and beliefs that aren’t always documented, oral history can add depth and potential clarity into understanding the past. Combining oral history with written records allows for a more comprehensive view of history. It acknowledges the complexity and multiple perspectives that shape historical events and experiences. Gathering and preserving oral histories can also engage communities in the process of historic preservation, fostering a sense of ownership and connection to their heritage.