The Texas Black Cooperative Extension & Home Demonstration Collection
The Texas Black Cooperative Extension & Home Demonstration Collection
By Evelyn Todd and T. DeWayne Moore
The Texas Black Cooperative Extension & Home Demonstration Collection is a monumental archival recovery effort that reshapes our understanding of Black rural experience, agricultural knowledge, and domestic science in twentieth-century Texas. The collections contains a total of 63 finding aids—one for each county in Texas for which records remain about the Extension service—163 archival boxes, and 3,219 acid-free folders. Comprising tens of thousands of reports, maps, and photographs across more sixty-three counties, the collection documents the lives and labor of Black Extension Agents, Home Demonstration Agents, and 4-H youth leaders—many of them trained at Prairie View A&M University, a Historically Black College and University founded in the last days of Reconstruction in Texas. The Extension service provided vital educational, economic, and social services to rural Black communities during an era defined by segregation, economic exploitation, agricultural transformation, and state-sanctioned racial violence. The surviving records reveal a different and often overlooked reality—one in which Black farm families engaged state institutions, shaped local knowledge, and sustained communities across generations.
But the true significance of this collection is amplified by the fact that the work of preserving, arranging, processing, and creating finding aids for these records was completed by students—graduate student Evelyn Todd and undergraduates Malachi McMahon, Allena Preston, Kalayah Jammer, Lindsay Boknight, Noah Jackson, Kiliyana Williams, D’Asia Johnson, Kasedi Eason, Zynitra Durham, Jaylynn Brantley, Hannah Harden, and Kendall Douglass. Their work was more significant than mere technical processing: it proved a three-year long intervention into the histories of archival gatekeeping, addressing how archives have traditionally operated as mechanisms of exclusion and power.
The Collection Through the Lens of Historical Scholarship
Historians such as Pete Daniel, Melissa Walker, Rebecca Sharpless, Katherine Jellison, Greta de Jong, and Adam Green have argued that Black rural life in the twentieth century was a site of profound creativity and resilience. Black Cooperative Extension Agents were knowledge producers: agricultural scientists, community organizers, nutrition educators, and mentors who functioned as intermediaries between federal agricultural policy and the everyday needs of marginalized communities.[1]
Pete Daniel, in Dispossession and The Shadow of Slavery, demonstrated how federal agricultural policy systematically marginalized Black farmers throughout the twentieth century. Yet Daniel also noted that Black Cooperative Extension Agents often served as critical buffers against discriminatory systems, helping rural families interpret programs, navigate bureaucracies, and resist economic dispossession.
This collection provides primary evidence of precisely this kind of grassroots advocacy.
Likewise, scholars of Black women’s history—Darlene Clark Hine, Ula Taylor, Evelyn Brooks Higginbotham, Stephanie Shaw, Thavolia Glymph, Deborah Gray White—have demonstrated how Black women built alternative infrastructures of care, health, and education in the Jim Crow South. The Home Demonstration records in this collection are a testament to that labor, documenting programs in household budgeting, child development, sanitation, food preservation, and leadership training.[2]
The archive also provides critical insight into youth development under segregation. Historians like Thomas J. Ward, Jr., Noliwe Rooks, Jarvis Givens, and Christopher Span have shown the central role of Black youth organizations—including 4-H clubs—in cultivating leadership, political consciousness, and community responsibility. The 4-H yearbooks, coronation programs, youth project lists, and meeting minutes preserved here confirm these scholarly arguments.[3]
Yet the Texas Black CE&HD Collection is not only historically important—its contemporary handling is, itself, a historically resonant act rooted in Black archival traditions and critiques of archival power.
Archival Administration, Gatekeeping, and Power: Contextualizing the Student Work
The field of archival studies has increasingly turned its attention to the politics of documentation, preservation, and access. Scholars such as Michel-Rolph Trouillot, in Silencing the Past, argued that archives are not neutral; they are sites where power determines what is remembered and what is forgotten.[4] Toni Morrison echoed this view when she wrote about the “erasure” built into dominant historical narratives and the need for Black communities to recover their own voices.[5]
The Texas Black Cooperative Extension & Home Demonstration Collection exists today precisely because of such erasure. Historically, Black Extension documents were not prioritized by state institutions, and many were left unprocessed or inaccessible. This is what archivist Verne Harris calls the regime of the archive: a structure that privileges certain stories and obscures others.[6]
Moreover, archival studies scholars such as Tonia Sutherland, Lae’l Hughes-Watkins, and Michelle Caswell have articulated how traditional archival institutions enact archival gatekeeping—a set of personal and structural biases that discourage research and disproportionately deny access to important collections. They argue that community archives and HBCU student-led archival projects disrupt these systems by reclaiming control over representation, memory, and interpretation. The Digital PV Panther Project—through which these students work—is precisely such a disruption.
Background Image: In 1941, Jeff Manning introduces Herefords to diversify farming in the Willow Grove community [PVAMU Archives, Texas, Black Home CE&HD Collection, McLennan County, Box 1, Folder 1]
PVAMU Students as Agents of Archival Justice
Students such as Evelyn Todd, Kasedi Eason, Noah Jackson, Zynitra Durham, Lindsay Boknight, and others have encountered firsthand the dynamics described by Caswell and Cifor in their theory of “archival care ethics.”[7] They do not process documents as detached administrators but as caretakers of their own community’s memory.
Their labor challenges the archival gatekeeping that has historically diminished the visibility of Black Extension Agents. As Jarrett Drake argues, dismantling archival oppression requires shifting authority from institutions that have long controlled the historical narrative to the communities whose histories have been marginalized.[8] PVAMU students embody this shift by asserting interpretive authority over the Extension archive.
Specific Contributions, Framed Through Archival Scholarship
- PVAMU Student Allena Preston’s careful arrangement of Anderson County materials reflects what public historian Randall Jimerson calls archival transparency—making the structures of documentation visible and legible.[9]
- PVAMU Students Hannah Harden’s and Kalayah Jammer’s meticulous processing for Angelina and many other counties opens the doors for scholars Lauren Klein and Kim Gallon’s approaches to Black feminist digital humanities that foreground relationships, context, and community memory.[10]
- PVAMU Students Lindsay Boknight’s and Kiliyana Williams’s extensive work across multiple counties models the distributed archival labor that public historian Terry Cook describes as essential for reshaping archival description in inclusive ways.[11]
- PVAMU Student Noah Jackson’s work on youth materials aligns with the work of anthropologist Cristen Smith as well as literary scholar Saidiya Hartman’s concept of “critical fabulation,” creating interpretive frameworks that restore humanity and complexity to Black children whose histories have often been flattened.[12]
- PVAMU Student D’Asia Johnson’s reconstruction of Brazoria and Waller Counties demonstrates the interpretive authority that archivist Brenda Gunn argues is necessary for archivists to ethically contextualize marginalized communities’ records.[13]
- PVAMU Student Zynitra Durham’s finding aids and careful processing of Cherokee and Colorado Counties exemplify what Saidiya Hartman describes as “narrative repair”—restoring agency to historical subjects subjected to archival silencing.[14]
- PVAMU Student Jaylynn Brantley’s work on McLennan County highlights the urban–rural hybridity historians such as Davarian Baldwin say traditional archives often ignore.[15]
- PVAMU Student Kendall Douglass’s and Graduate Student Evelyn Todd’s restoration of coastal and Brazos Valley counties directly answers archivist Lae’l Hughes-Watkins’s call for “reparative description” that counters historical distortions.[16]
Re-Centering Black Knowledge Production
The Texas Black CE&HD Collection reveals a world of Black scientific expertise—soil analysis, livestock management, home budgeting, nutrition science, clothing construction, sanitation engineering, youth leadership training. Scholars like Hannah-Rose Murray, Monica White, and Catherine Stewart have shown that Black agricultural knowledge was often dismissed by white state authorities but remained central to community survival.[17]
The students working on the Digital PV Panther Project confirmed that, across county after county, Extension Agents recorded deeply technical knowledge that historians have only begun to grapple with. The Texas Black CE&HD Collection contains more than mere bureaucratic documents; they bring the intellectual histories of the reciprocal relationship between rural Black Texans and PVAMU to life.
The students working for the Digital PV Panther Project are essential to the preservation and interpretation of the university’s archival collections. First, they know the cultural contexts. As Elsa Barkley Brown argues, Black communities are not monolithic; they function through intricate networks of mutuality. PVAMU students, many from Texas rural or semi-rural communities, perceive cultural nuances others might miss.[18] Second, they inherit an institutional legacy. Prairie View A&M University trained many of the agents who spent long hours writing these reports. Students today continue that mission by preserving their intellectual output. Third, the students challenge gatekeeping practices and the dominant historical frameworks. Students’ interpretations refuse narratives that portray Black rural communities as passive or static. Instead, they show them as dynamic, resourceful, and self-determining. Fourth, they function as what Hughes-Watkins calls “activist archivists.”[19] By reclaiming control over the long-unprocessed, neglected records and narrative, these students disrupt archival hierarchies and restore dignity to historical subjects.
Conclusion:
Students as Disruptors in the Archives at PVAMU
Photo: Team Leader Noah Jackson and RISE Graduate Research Assistant Evelyn Todd stand in front of the fully processed Texas Black Cooperative Extension & Home Demonstration Collection in 2024
The Texas Black Cooperative Extension & Home Demonstration Collection is not merely a record of the past. It’s a statement about the importance of disrupting power dynamics in the archives. It’s a blueprint for the collaborative processing of future projects on campus, and it demonstrates the dire need for digital preservation at PVAMU. Through the hands and intellect of McMahon, Preston, Jammer, Boknight, Jackson, Johnson, Eason, Durham, Brantley, Todd, Harden, and Douglass, the PVAMU archive became a site of reclamation, empowerment, and scholarly innovation. Their work demonstrates what scholars like Michelle Caswell, Verne Harris, and Tonia Sutherland have long argued: archives are not neutral—they reflect the power of those who shape them.[20] By entrusting the organization, processing, and finding aid creation to PVAMU students, the Digital PV Panther Project overturns decades of institutional gatekeeping and recenters Black communities in the production of their own historical narratives.
In 2021, the Division of Social Sciences received almost half a million dollars from the National Endowment for the Humanities to prevent the erasure of unprocessed manuscript collections at Prairie View A&M University through the Digital PV Panther Project. The award primarily supported the employment of upper-level undergraduates from a range of majors to help preserve some of the oldest and most fragile manuscripts on campus. From 2021 to 2024, Dr. T. DeWayne Moore worked alongside more than a dozen students to preserve evidence of the resilience, expertise, and innovation that shaped Black communities for generations, forging Prairie View’s position as a statewide educational and social institution. Dr. Moore wrote numerous internal grants to continue the processing project, including a total of five internal RISE grants to hire graduate research assistant, Evelyn Todd. He worked with Human Resources to hire work study students, and he created new student hourly positions using indirect funds from prior grants to continue employing team leader, Noah Jackson, long after the official NEH grant period had ended.
The work of the Digital PV Panther Project is not merely archival processing. It’s a much-needed movement for archival justice at PVAMU. It’s HBCU intellectual power in action, and the Digital PV Panther Project works tirelessly to acquire additional funding to purchase new equipment and hire additional students to prevent the erasure of historic resources on campus. We still have much work to finish in regard to the Texas Black Cooperative Extension & Home Demonstration Collection, specifically the digitization of the documents and the online dissemination of the entire manuscript collection—an unfulfilled deliverable promised to the original sponsor of the project, the National Endowment for the Humanities. In Fall 2025, the Digital PV Panther Project relocated its student-driven preservation efforts to the Division of Social Sciences and opened the Woolfolk Digital Preservation Lab in Room 103 of the George Ruble Woolfolk Building. Named in honor of the longtime chair of the History Department, it’s one of several buildings on campus listed on the National Register of Historic Places.
WORK COMPLETED BY PVAMU STUDENTS
Counties processed:
63 counties across Texas – 100% student-processed
Boxes handled:
163 archival boxes labeled, filled, sorted, and reorganized
Folders described:
3,219 folders with standardized metadata and series-level classification
Reports organized:
More than 2,100 Extension reports including Annual Reports, Combined Annuals, Monthly Reports, and Annual Narrative Reports
Home Demonstration & 4-H records:
Over 1,100 youth and homemaking records documenting Black women’s leadership and rural child development
ESTIMATED HOURS OF STUDENT LABOR
| Activity | Hours |
|---|---|
| Physical processing of 163 boxes | ~600 hours |
| Folder-level description | ~1,250 hours |
| Metadata creation | ~900 hours |
| Quality control & revisions | ~350 hours |
| Digital publishing & formatting | ~200 hours |
TOTAL ESTIMATED STUDENT HOURS:
≈ 3,300 hours
Equivalent to:
2 full-time archivists working for a year, or
10 students working part-time across 4 semesters
The Texas Black Cooperative Extension & Home Demonstration Collection
All 63 Finding Aids – 200 Pages – in Alphabetical Order
NOTES
[1] Pete Daniel, Dispossession: Discrimination Against African American Farmers in the Age of Civil Rights (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2013); Daniel, Breaking the Land: The Transformation of Cotton, Tobacco, and Rice Cultures since 1880 (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1985); Melissa Walker, All We Knew Was to Farm: Rural Women in the Upcountry South, 1919–1941 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000); Katherine Jellison, Entitled to Power: Farm Women and Technology, 1913–1963 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1993); Rebecca Sharpless, Cooking in Other Women’s Kitchens: Domestic Workers in the South, 1865–1960 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2010); Jessamyn Neuhaus, Manly Meals and Mom’s Home Cooking: Cookbooks and Gender in Modern America (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003); Greta de Jong, You Can’t Eat Freedom: Southerners and Social Justice after the Civil Rights Movement (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2016); Adam Green, Selling the Race: Culture, Community, and Black Chicago, 1940–1955 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006).
[2] Darlene Clark Hine, Hine Sight: Black Women and the Re-Construction of American History (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1997); Ula Y. Taylor, The Promise of Patriarchy: Women and the Nation of Islam (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2017); Evelyn Brooks Higginbotham, Righteous Discontent: The Women’s Movement in the Black Baptist Church, 1880–1920 (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1993); Stephanie Shaw, What a Woman Ought to Be and to Do: Black Professional Women Workers During the Jim Crow Era (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996); Thavolia Glymph, Out of the House of Bondage: The Transformation of the Plantation Household (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008); Deborah Gray White, Ar’n’t I a Woman?: Female Slaves in the Plantation South (New York: W.W. Norton, 1985).
[3] Thomas J. Ward Jr., Black Physicians in the Jim Crow South (Fayetteville: University of Arkansas Press, 2003); Noliwe Rooks, Cutting School: Privatization, Segregation, and the End of Public Education (New York: The New Press, 2017); Jarvis R. Givens, Fugitive Pedagogy: Carter G. Woodson and the Art of Black Teaching (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2021); Christopher M. Span, From Cotton Field to Schoolhouse: African American Education in Mississippi, 1862–1875 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2009).
[4] Michel-Rolph Trouillot, Silencing the Past: Power and the Production of History (Boston: Beacon Press, 1995).
[5] Toni Morrison, “The Site of Memory,” in Inventing the Truth: The Art and Craft of Memoir, ed. William Zinsser (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1987), 183–200.
[6] Verne Harris, Archives and Justice: A South African Perspective (Chicago: Society of American Archivists, 2007)
[7] Michelle Caswell and Marika Cifor, “From Human Rights to Feminist Ethics: Radical Empathy in the Archives,” Archivaria 81 (2016): 23–43.
[8] Jarrett Drake, “Documenting Dissent in the Contemporary United States: A Theoretical Framework for an Activist Archives,” Archivaria 82 (2016): 23–47.
[9] Randall C. Jimerson, Archives Power: Memory, Accountability, and Social Justice (Chicago: Society of American Archivists, 2009).
[10] Lauren Klein, An Archive of Taste: Race and Eating in the Early United States (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2020); Kim Gallon, “Making a Case for the Black Digital Humanities,” Debates in the Digital Humanities (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2016).
[11] Terry Cook, “The Archive(s) Is a Foreign Country: Historians, Archivists, and the Changing Archival Landscape,” The American Archivist 74, no. 2 (Fall/Winter 2011): 600–632.
[12] Saidiya Hartman’s method of critical fabulation provides an essential historiographical framework for reconstructing the lives of Black children whose presence in the archival record has been fragmented, distorted, or silenced by the racialized logic of state power. In “Venus in Two Acts,” Hartman theorizes critical fabulation as a practice of narrating possibility within and against the gaps of the colonial archive—a way of restoring humanity, agency, and emotional depth to subjects whose experiences were systematically reduced to administrative fragments or juridical shorthand. This framework is especially generative for interpreting youth materials in the CE&HD collection, where the voices, achievements, and everyday lives of rural Black children appear only indirectly through enrollment lists, brief performance summaries, or adult-authored reports. As scholars such as Marisa Fuentes and Jessica Marie Johnson have demonstrated, the absences, silences, and distortions of the archive are themselves products of violent historical structures; therefore, reconstructing marginalized lives requires methodological approaches that refuse to reproduce that violence. When applied to 4-H records, achievement booklets, and scattered county reports, critical fabulation allows the historian to read beyond bureaucratic surfaces and to imagine the worlds of aspiration, learning, fear, pride, and creativity that shaped Black childhood in rural Texas. Rather than treating youth as passive objects of state programs, the method foregrounds their agency and lived experience. In this sense, critical fabulation becomes not an embellishment but an ethical imperative—one that recognizes that restoring complexity to Black children’s histories is part of a larger scholarly project of repairing the harms of archival marginalization; see, Saidiya Hartman, “Venus in Two Acts,” Small Axe 12, no. 2 (2008): 1–14; Christen A. Smith, Afro-Paradise: Blackness, Violence, and Performance in Brazil (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2016).
[13] Brenda Gail Gunn, “Archives and Human Rights: Contextualizing Archival Authority,” Archival Science 14, nos. 3–4 (2014): 277–290.
[14] Saidiya Hartman, Wayward Lives, Beautiful Experiments: Intimate Histories of Social Upheaval (New York: W.W. Norton, 2019), xvii–xxii.
[15] Davarian L. Baldwin, In the Shadow of the Ivory Tower: How Universities Are Plundering Our Cities (New York: Bold Type Books, 2021).
[16] Lae’l Hughes-Watkins, “Moving Toward a Reparative Archive: A Roadmap for Black Women’s Collections,” Journal of Contemporary Archival Studies 5 (2018): 1–12.
[17] See Hannah-Rose Murray, Advocates of Freedom: African American Transatlantic Abolitionism in the British Isles (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020); Monica M. White, Freedom Farmers: Agricultural Resistance and the Black Freedom Movement (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2019); and Catherine Stewart, Long Past Slavery: Representing Race in the Federal Writers’ Project (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2016).
[18] Elsa Barkley Brown, “Negotiating and Transforming the Public Sphere: African American Political Life in the Transition from Slavery to Freedom,” Public Culture 7, no. 1 (1994): 107–46.
[19] Lae’l Hughes-Watkins, “Moving Toward a Reparative Archive: A Roadmap for Black Women’s Collections,” Journal of Contemporary Archival Studies 5 (2018): 1–12.
[20] Michelle Caswell, Urgent Archives: Enacting Liberatory Memory Work (New York: Routledge, 2021); Tonia Sutherland, “Archival Amnesty: Memory, Erasure, and the ‘Improper’ Archive,” in Critical Archival Studies, ed. Michelle Caswell et al. (Sacramento: Litwin Books, 2017), 87–110; Verne Harris, Archives and Justice: A South African Perspective (Chicago: Society of American Archivists, 2007).